Adv. Ruth Loven, assisted by intern Dean Kafri, represented Tnuva in canceling a fine imposed on the company on the grounds of misleading the consumer regarding chicken products manufactured by Kornish Chen and only marketed by Tnuva. The Authority claimed that the slogan "Tnuva does everything to ensure product quality" is misleading, because Tnuva is not the manufacturer of these products, while Kornish Chen is, and therefore imposed a fine on Tnuva. The Rishon Lezion Magistrate's Court accepted the appeal filed by Tnuva and cancelled the fine. The court ruled that in the given circumstances, the slogan is not misleading, and also that there were various flaws in the imposition of the fine. The cancelled fine was the largest sanction ever imposed by the Consumer Protection Authority.

Advs. Oren Roth, Noam Shochat and Guy Ziv-Shalom represented Cellcom in a petition against the Ministry of Education after Cellcom was refused to participate in a tender for school supplies, claiming that the Ministry of Education relied on a previous tender won by Pelephone and Partner in 2016.

Advs. Ido Chitman, Edan Regev and Guy Yarom represent gym and fitness club chain Holmes Place Israel in a petition to the High Court of Justice against the forced closure of gyms in Israel due to Covid-19. The petition, aimed at the Israeli government and Israel's PM Netanyahu, claims the decision to force gyms in Israel to cease operation was arbitrary and the presumption that gyms are a focal point for transmitting the Covid-19 virus has no factual basis.
 

Advs Mordehai Baicz and David Shmulevitz represented the Chabad movement in an ongoing dispute between them and the Moshav Meron Committee, regarding the use of the traditional Lag B'Omer holiday compound in Meron. The Nazareth District Court rejected the Meron Committee's petition and ruled that the Chabad movement would be able to conduct activities in the compound on Lag BaOmer.